We wonder if you’ve heard about a double bind? Let us give you a short definition:
A double bind is a dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives two or more conflicting messages, with one negating the other. In some circumstances (particularly families and relationships) this might be emotionally distressing. This creates a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a failed response to the other (and vice versa), so that the person will automatically be wrong regardless of response. The double bind occurs when the person cannot confront the inherent dilemma, and therefore can neither resolve it nor opt out of the situation.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind
So enforcing all of those rules – social distancing, face-masks, lockdowns etc., which do NOT have any scientific background and are extremely harmful is not psychopathy! Resisting them is! Wow! So, if we fight the lockdowns because we see people loosing their lives, loosing they business, etc, if we fight face masks because we see how harmful they are to people who are forced to wear them 8+ hours a day for no fucking reason,… this makes us psychopaths! There can be only one rational conclusion to all of this – planet Earth has been destroyed in a global cataclysm, we all have died and ended up in hell where everything is upside down.
Are you tired of social distancing? Tired of the lockdowns? Do you find yourself wishing things would just go back to normal like they were in 2019 when we were all just regular debt slaves to the central banks?
Well then you just might be a psychopath. That’s right according to a brand new peer reviewed study published on May 31st 2020 people who ignore the new normal protocols like social distancing display certain antagonistic personality traits.
Luckily, These traits have been identified and they are called the dark triad.
It appears we are fast approaching a time when opposing the establishment and questioning the government will be considered a mental disorder.
Some of the posts we share are controversial and we do not necessarily agree with them in the whole extend. Sometimes we agree with the content or part of it but we do not agree with the narration or language. Nevertheless we find them somehow interesting, valuable and/or informative or we share them, because we strongly believe in freedom of speech, free press and journalism. We strongly encourage you to have a critical approach to all the content, do your own research and analysis to build your own opinion.
We would be glad to have your feedback.