Despite the IFR of COVID being similar to that of the flu,
(a fact known to gov), unjustified policies continue.
It is time to “put a nail in the IFR coffin. It is time proportionality is upheld again as a key principle in our public life”@GirardotMarc 1/https://t.co/SMo8taP7AE— Abir Ballan (@abirballan) January 20, 2022
Here's @DrJBhattacharya's estimate since APRIL 2020
“94 deaths out of 54,000 infections correspond to an infection fatality rate of 0.17% in Santa Clara County”@Stanford
2/https://t.co/mBJ3A8DlVF— Abir Ballan (@abirballan) January 20, 2022
Here's Prof Ioannidis's estimate in MAY 2020@Stanford
3/https://t.co/Y8RvGP5ZXQ pic.twitter.com/EsXbKy5Gg7— Abir Ballan (@abirballan) January 20, 2022
Here are further confirmations of the low IFR for the majority of the population
4/https://t.co/JDbmu2Pddn— Abir Ballan (@abirballan) January 20, 2022
The focus of the health policies- if they were about health at all – should have been on the vulnerable. 5/5https://t.co/Eo48Aoyd12
— Abir Ballan (@abirballan) January 20, 2022
“Civilisation is more fragile than we all thought, it is always on the brink of collapse, at the mercy of human hubris, self-serving interests and the panic of the crowd.” @GirardotMarc @PanData19
— Abir Ballan (@abirballan) January 20, 2022
About Abir Ballan:
The post Thread by @abirballan Jan 20, 2022 appeared first on PANDA.
Disclaimer
Some of the posts we share are controversial and we do not necessarily agree with them in the whole extend. Sometimes we agree with the content or part of it but we do not agree with the narration or language. Nevertheless we find them somehow interesting, valuable and/or informative or we share them, because we strongly believe in freedom of speech, free press and journalism. We strongly encourage you to have a critical approach to all the content, do your own research and analysis to build your own opinion.
We would be glad to have your feedback.
Source: PANDA Read the original article here: https://www.pandata.org