![Former CDC Director Admits the Truth](https://brownstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Shutterstock_1707264835.jpg)
Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, anyone who questioned lockdowns, mask mandates, the lab leak, or school closures was vilified by the media, politicians, and the “expert” community.
Unproven policies without any supporting evidence, as even Dr. Anthony Fauci now admits, were suddenly immutable truths that could not be questioned. Those who did raise legitimate questions about the efficacy of such policies were labeled “grandma killers” or anti-science “freedumb” lovers.
Well, in a surprising turn of events you can now count the former head of the CDC as a member of the “anti-science” community. In particular was the role of Covid vaccines, and how influential Big Pharma was in pushing for indefensible mandates.
Dr. Robert Redfield discussed our pandemic response in a recent interview with Chris Cuomo and made some stunning admissions about how our Covid policies and mandates developed and were justified.
And suddenly those of us who claimed that masks didn’t work or that our response was a dramatic overreach don’t seem so “free dumb” anymore. But don’t expect apologies anytime soon.
![](https://brownstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-7.png)
Former CDC Director Discusses Lab Leak, Vaccine Rollout
Redfield, who ran the CDC for most of 2020, said he believes that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was working on vaccine development in the lab, and that its research was directly responsible for the release of the coronavirus.
This isn’t the first time that Redfield has spoken out about his belief that the virus spread as a result of a lab-related incident, but it takes on increased significance as Dr. Fauci desperately attempts to downplay his own role in gain-of-function research or the suppression of the lab-leak theory.
Redfield also shared how the rollout of the Covid vaccine played out much differently than it should have, while admitting that vaccine mandates were a disastrous mistake.
“I thought that these vaccines should be prioritized for nursing homes, prioritized for assisted living, prioritized for the elderly, over 60, 65, and yet that’s not what happened,” Redfield said. “There was this, everyone had to get vaccinated.”
That’s precisely what various medical voices like Scott Atlas and Jay Bhattacharya declared after the vaccines were released. And they were demonized, attacked, and labeled for their efforts. Now the former head of the CDC just admitted that should have always been the case.
Cuomo wondered why the priorities changed, asking, “Was it because of Big Pharma?” Redfield agreed, saying “Yeah, I think there definitely was a huge influence by the pharmaceutical industry, Pfizer, Moderna, I think you did, you know, you pointed out that there was a big push.”
Wait a second; anyone who previously said that Pfizer and Moderna were using their power and leverage to influence politicians, regulatory bodies, advisory organizations, media, and the “expert” community to promote their vaccines was labeled a conspiracy theorist. Now someone who ran one of those very organizations admits that they were, in fact, pressuring people to “push” their vaccines?
Redfield also stated that he personally prefers to use the protein-based vaccines, not mRNA, because we don’t make the body a “manufacturing plant” for the spike protein.
“The spike protein is immunotoxic. You get infected, it’s immunotoxic. But when you give the vaccine, we make the spike protein.”
“When I give you an mRNA vaccine…I don’t know how much spike protein you make because I give you mRNA and then your body goes and makes it…You may make it for a week…You may make it for a month.”
“I use the protein vaccine so I know exactly how much spike protein you get. Your body’s not becoming a [spike protein] manufacturing plant.”
After being told for years to listen to the “experts,” trust the science, and comply with whatever you were told to do by those with public health credentials, it seems unlikely the media will suddenly be willing to cover what Redfield now says. “The Science” can only be trusted if it’s repeating what the political left wants to believe.
Redfield Admits No One Wanted to Release Negative Information about Covid Vaccines
Redfield also told Cuomo that he believed there was a concerted effort by the CDC under Rochelle Walensky and the Biden administration not to release information that could make the vaccines look bad.
“I mean, I was upset with CDC when I left because they stopped tracking people that were infected that were previously vaccinated,” Redfield said. Cuomo jumped in to ask, “Why?”
Redfield continued, “Well because then you couldn’t report that there were people vaccinated that got infected.” Cuomo asked again why they stopped tracking it. And that’s when Redfield admitted what was obvious to many outside observers since 2021: “I think there was a decision not to do anything that made the vaccine sound like it didn’t work.”
That one sentence, now on the record from the former head of the CDC, explains perfectly how so many inexcusable policies were enacted and continued for years on end. The pharmaceutical companies, Fauci, the Biden administration’s CDC, and other “experts” simply wouldn’t acknowledge that the vaccine was not performing to the level they’d expected it to.
Fauci, Redfield’s replacement Rochelle Walensky, and the public health industrial complex had assured the public that the vaccine would be 100 percent effective in preventing the spread of the virus. The media repeated those claims while demonizing the “unvaccinated,” and platforming the very same “experts” who were wrong about masks and lockdowns to be wrong about vaccines. So tracking the so-called “breakthrough” cases was untenable, since it made Pfizer and Moderna’s shots appear ineffective.
Those of us paying attention already knew this to be the case, because intellectually honest jurisdictions showed how ineffective the vaccines and boosters actually were at preventing infection or transmission.
![](https://brownstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-8-800x451.png)
And highly vaccinated populations saw uncontrolled spread.
![](https://brownstone.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-9-800x451.png)
None of it mattered though, because “experts” wouldn’t acknowledge it.
Vaccine Mandates Were Unjustifiable
Redfield also admitted that many cases early on after the vaccine rollout were, despite public messaging, among the vaccinated. Part of that was the fault of the Biden administration which mandated and attempted to mandate the Covid vaccines for everyone.
“You know I’ve always tried to be honest that I think there were some major mistakes in the vaccines, they should have never been mandated,” he said. “I also felt that people should have been more honest about the fact that there were side effects to those vaccines and some people were actually harmed.”
“The other thing I thought is that there should be more honesty about the fact that the vaccines don’t protect against infection. I remember Biden saying this is an epidemic of the unvaccinated. When I was [Larry] Hogan’s chief public health advisor in Maryland after I left CDC, I was saying, ‘wait a minute, two-thirds of the people that I’m seeing infected in Maryland have been vaccinated.’”
Yet the media had no interest in telling that story, acknowledging that the vaccines were not preventing infection. And they were helped along by Biden, Fauci, and the new CDC.
“I mean the president of the United States, said ‘This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated,’ Tony wasn’t aggressive in putting this in perspective, the CDC didn’t put it in perspective.”
Perspective sure would have been nice, wouldn’t it?
Lockdowns Were ‘Overreach’
Redfield discussed government “overreach,” how they took advantage of pandemic uncertainty to demand ever more harmful mandates.
“Was there overreach by the government, I think there’s no question about it,” Redfield said. “I might even argue it got worse in the Biden administration. For example, absolutely never should have mandated vaccines, period. Terrible decision. These vaccines do not prevent infection.”
While Redfield said they prevent serious illness and death for the elderly, he also said there was no justification for mandating them for young people.
“The rationale for mandating vaccines for healthy firefighters, police officers and the military and hospital workers, teachers…was emotional. We should have always honored individual choice on those vaccines,” Redfield said.
He also defended natural immunity, saying it was ignored and people were fired. “The lockdowns, overreach,” he continued.
Redfield admitted that Fauci, Birx, and the president had the meeting to decide if lockdowns should be continued, and that he was against closing schools. It wasn’t science-based policy, it was “emotionalism” with teachers. “All of that, no doubt was overreach by the government,” he said. It was also a “big mistake,” and we “paid a big price for it.”
Amazing to see the former CDC director now sound exactly like the “Covid minimizers” that the media loved to criticize. Especially to Chris Cuomo, whose brother Andrew was one of the chief architects of the forever lockdown, school closures, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates. All of it. He demonized anyone who said these policies had negative, harmful side effects that would cause more harm than good.
This is all great to hear now, but where was he when these policies were in effect? Why was his own agency undermining his positions? The answer to that is likely the ideological capture on the part of the vast majority of CDC employees, as well as disinterest on the part of the media which clearly preferred to push Peter Hotez or Leana Wen’s egregious disinformation.
It’s a perfect summation of how emotional overreaction and overreach overran the country during the pandemic, causing immense harm with zero benefits. No wonder Fauci doesn’t want to take responsibility now for the damage he caused then.
Republished from the author’s Substack
Disclaimer
Some of the posts we share are controversial and we do not necessarily agree with them in the whole extend. Sometimes we agree with the content or part of it but we do not agree with the narration or language. Nevertheless we find them somehow interesting, valuable and/or informative or we share them, because we strongly believe in freedom of speech, free press and journalism. We strongly encourage you to have a critical approach to all the content, do your own research and analysis to build your own opinion.
We would be glad to have your feedback.
Source: Brownstone Institute Read the original article here: https://brownstone.org/